Delivered-To: lablgtk at yquem.inria.fr Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:38:23 +0000 To: Vu Ngoc San Subject: Re: [Lablgtk] glade or not Message-ID: <20071110203823.GA16012 at furbychan.cocan.org> References: <200711061646.23450.san.vu-ngoc at laposte.net> <200711101030.28645.san.vu-ngoc@laposte.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200711101030.28645.san.vu-ngoc at laposte.net> From: Richard Jones Cc: lablgtk at yquem.inria.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Length: 965 On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 10:30:28AM +0100, Vu Ngoc San wrote: > Le Tuesday 06 November 2007 16:46:23 Vu Ngoc San, vous avez écrit : > > I am learning GTK thanks to lablgtk, and one question seems to raise > > inevitably: should I use glade or not ? What are the advantages (and > > drawbacks, if any ?) > > Right, so you have no opinion, or is it just that there is nobody on this > list ? Hello San, I read your initial email and obviously along with others didn't have much of an opinion ... but I'll offer one anyway. I have used Glade with Python (not with OCaml but the principle is the same) and I really didn't see what the great benefit was. I found it tricky and slow to use, and rather inaccurate. However I guess if it works for you then use it, otherwise don't :-) Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat _______________________________________________ Lablgtk mailing list Lablgtk@yquem.inria.fr http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lablgtk