Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 03:28:55 +0200
To: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue at kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Cc: sven.luther at wanadoo.fr, lablgtk at kaba.or.jp
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: lablGL, LablGTK1, LablGTK2 combined release
Message-ID: <20031011012855.GA29759 at iliana>
References: <20031010134222.GA12891 at iliana> <20031010224947D.garrigue at kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <20031010135934.GA15689 at iliana> <20031011102243A.garrigue at kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031011102243A.garrigue at kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
From: Sven Luther <sven.luther at wanadoo.fr>

On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 10:22:43AM +0900, Jacques Garrigue wrote:
> From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
> > > > Saddly, Olivier's patch which add support for set/get_label on buttons
> > > > was not included, this means people using this feature cannot use the
> > > > prebuilt windows libaries, and i was wanting to do just that :((
> > > 
> > > Remy Vanicat gave another way to do this, somehow cleaner.
> > 
> > But less convenient, ok i will use that.
> 
> Claudio Sacerdoti gave another method, that you can indeed use for
> properties that are not available as methods

Yep, that i will do.

> > > I'm a bit concerned about set/get_label, as it is not "safe".
> > 
> > Mmm, way is it not safe ? Because you may want to remove the text
> > widget or not add it, and then it will break ? It could simply raise a
> > Not_found exception or something in this case.
> 
> I just wanted to check first how the label property is implemented, in
> particularly what it does on a button without label.

Ok.

> > BTW, you didn't comment on the lablgl examples directory removal.
> 
> Sorry I missed the comment.
> It is not removed, it just moved to Togl/examples, as explained in the
> README. This is to avoid confusion, as some examples use Togl and
> others use LablGlut.

Ok, i completely missed them.

Friendly,

Sven Luther