Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:59:35 +0200
To: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue at kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Cc: sven.luther at wanadoo.fr, lablgtk at kaba.or.jp
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: lablGL, LablGTK1, LablGTK2 combined release
Message-ID: <20031010135934.GA15689 at iliana>
References: <20031010185936H.garrigue at kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <20031010134222.GA12891 at iliana> <20031010224947D.garrigue at kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031010224947D.garrigue at kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
From: Sven Luther <sven.luther at wanadoo.fr>

On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 10:49:47PM +0900, Jacques Garrigue wrote:
> From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
> 
> > Saddly, Olivier's patch which add support for set/get_label on buttons
> > was not included, this means people using this feature cannot use the
> > prebuilt windows libaries, and i was wanting to do just that :((
> 
> Remy Vanicat gave another way to do this, somehow cleaner.

But less convenient, ok i will use that.

> I'm a bit concerned about set/get_label, as it is not "safe".

Mmm, way is it not safe ? Because you may want to remove the text
widget or not add it, and then it will break ? It could simply raise a
Not_found exception or something in this case.

> At least I need some time to consider, and I don't think that you want
> lablgtk2 to be delayed, do you?

Maybe by using a button_and_label constructor which would return both ?

And no, i would not like it to be delayed.

BTW, you didn't comment on the lablgl examples directory removal.

Friendly,

Sven Luther