Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 21:57:08 +0200 (MEST)
From: Henri Dubois-Ferriere <henridf at lcavsun1.epfl.ch>
Reply-To: Henri DF <henri.dubois-ferriere at epfl.ch>
To: caml-list at inria.fr
Cc: lablgtk at kaba.or.jp
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] labltk vs lablgtk
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0304102108010.5571-100000 at lcavsun10.epfl.ch>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0304102155500.5571-100000 at lcavsun10.epfl.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

mea culpa, i didn't do my homework completely.

looking at the gtk docs i found that

gdk_input_add

should be what i was asking for.

henri

On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Henri Dubois-Ferriere wrote:

> thanks for all this valuable info.
>
> one further question: is there an easy way to add file descriptor events
> into lablgtk's event loop like with labltk?
> i looked around but didn't find any examples/documentation of
> this anywhere.
>
> thanks
>
> henri
>
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, scott wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 11:18:26AM -0600, Matt Gushee wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 04:00:58PM +0200, Henri Dubois-Ferriere wrote:
> > > >
> > > > But since I'm going to live with this choice for quite a while, i'm
> > > > wondering what are the broad pros/cons between labltk and lablgtk?
> > > > does anything stick out as being specific to one or the other?
> > >
> > > Let's see ...
> > >
> > [...]
> >
> > > * (My impression is that) GTK has good Unicode support. Tk has had issues
> > >   with i18n for some time. The latest versions may be up to par, but I'm
> > >   not sure. Probably either would be fine for Western European
> > >   languages; the problems I have heard of were mostly related to
> > CJKV.
> >
> > The new gtk (2) has good unicode support.  I'm not sure how that's
> > addressed in lablgtk (2).  Tk works with unicode, but labltk does
> > not.  It is possible to hack labltk to do this, but it's _very_ ugly
> > (trust me I've done it)
> >
> > scott
> >
> > -------------------
> > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> >
>
>
>
>
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
>