Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:06:56 +0100
From: Florian Hars <florian at hars.de>
To: Benjamin Monate <Benjamin.Monate at lri.fr>
Cc: caml-list at inria.fr, lablgtk at kaba.or.jp
Subject: To glade or not to glade (Was: [Caml-announce] Mlglade prerelease announce)
Message-ID: <20011128090656.B7752 at hars>
References: <20011127200825.7937abc2.Benjamin.Monate at lri.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20011127200825.7937abc2.Benjamin.Monate at lri.fr>; from Benjamin.Monate at lri.fr on Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 08:08:25PM +0100
Sender: Florian Hars <hars at bik-gmbh.de>

On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 08:08:25PM +0100, Benjamin Monate wrote:
> I am happy to announce the first prerelease of mlglade : a glade to ocaml
> compiler.

OK, now we have mlglade
> http://www.lri.fr/~monate/mlglade
which uses Glade output, but is independent from libglade

the libglade support in LablGTK
http://wwwfun.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/soft/olabl/lablgtk.html
which, obviously, is different from mlglade in that it requires
libglade

and zoggy
http://pauillac.inria.fr/~guesdon/Tools/zoggy/zoggy.html
which is an independent reimplementation of the glade functionality.

Which should I use?
:-)

Yours, Florian.