MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <17183.23538.261931.923821 at karryall.dnsalias.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 23:30:26 +0200
From: Olivier Andrieu <andrieu at ijm.jussieu.fr>
To: Robert Roessler <robertr at rftp.com>
Cc: lablgtk at math.nagoya-u.ac.jp
Subject: Re: Timeout (windows/linux comparison)
In-Reply-To: <431E7655.1020204 at rftp.com>
References: <431D8AA6.20102 at laposte.net>
	<431E7655.1020204@rftp.com>

 Robert Roessler [Tuesday 6 September 2005] :
 >
 > Since it is not clear if this granularity is due to the timeout
 > facility implementation or to gettimeofday itself, I then tried to
 > run timeouts with smaller intervals and use GLib GTimers for higher
 > accuracy in the time *measurement*... and found that GTimers do not
 > appear to be wrapped by LablGTK (at least as of the last CVS
 > snapshot of 7/1). :(

Well, GTimer just seem to provide the same functionality as
Unix.gettimeofday (platform-independant time querying), so it did not
seem very important to wrap them.

-- 
   Olivier