Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 15:24:14 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20050602.152414.30445755.garrigue at math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> To: robertr at rftp.com Cc: lablgtk at math.nagoya-u.ac.jp Subject: Re: Additional export request from dlllablgtk2 From: Jacques Garrigue In-Reply-To: <429E7E3B.90003 at rftp.com> References: <4296897F.7060007 at rftp.com> <20050602.092311.96685144.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> <429E7E3B.90003@rftp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Robert Roessler > You (and Olivier) occasionally mention "the CVS version"... yet the > only LablGTK page I am aware of > (http://wwwfun.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/soft/olabl/lablgtk.html) never > talks about CVS access. Is public (RO, of course) access available? Unfortunately, no. Anonymous CVS creates security problems, and I cannot take this risk. The advantage of the current situation is that I have full control of the CVS server, and can easily add people who wish to contribute. But not read-only. Having the sources on the caml server at INRIA would be an option too. But it's less flexible. I'm not too enthousiastic at moving to sourceforge either, because I'm afraid it would be harder to fix things when needed. So, the current solution is to have CVS for developpers, and snapshots for users. Snapshots happen when there are significant changes, or when there is special demand. If you tell me that you need a snapshot because you want to distribute some code that depends on a bug fix, then I will do it... Jacques