Delivered-To: garrigue at math.nagoya-u.ac.jp
Authentication-Results: mailhost.math.nagoya-u.ac.jp sender=lablgtk-bounces at yquem.inria.fr; domainkey=neutral (no query protocol specified; no policy for yquem.inria.fr)
Delivered-To: lablgtk at yquem.inria.fr
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id
	:subject:from:to:content-type;
	bh=hRzWMG/4R7n2drQc2rWQcLMz3fXlkaVz44T4ODe9QDI=;
	b=URIj21x6dsA4r4dh2B1RKnNmOhFLUsS8w7r4fs3iBi/xgrpi+mn6/9/t/f9Obdu7Sc
	UtZs6xLKH7TnOHx3lPNA4rVaVsmwbkhhJ6UcNurHJLEufOdI5V3pMCecpvvaxVfXLix0
	tPNtCxs7miXGuuokoRymU0cxaeDNXm48eYY3U=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
	b=t2yR7QNC8EXEFvQi8ZcqgyR2jYG9iatGNskcCpV86FCTkwzO2qH2ZJDS4189/9Tm3V
	pK9sO4i++NKI3SMBwQyEclO6qBBdiofFXRsZQ15S8eCwkIMKcqQ9gbHDWN10FDKeIj8j
	cEi/wcVxlSnM4r2i6ZGuYjviLRRpqfbURG5+w=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 14:38:25 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTim=n8X5XegY-WVn_SFQsWw3Gjertf_MpFQJB=s0 at mail.gmail.com>
From: Johan Mazel <johan.mazel at gmail.com>
To: lablgtk at yquem.inria.fr
Subject: [Lablgtk] Lablgtk interface to GtkCurve
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1646320273=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Status: U

--===============1646320273==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175ce134338b5f048fbecaf5

--0015175ce134338b5f048fbecaf5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi
I want to draw several curve using GTK+ and Lablgtk.
According to my research, the most appropriate class for this is the class
called GtkCurve (http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/2.16/GtkCurve.html).
However, in GTK+ documentation (cf previous link), this class is considered
"too specialized/little-used for GTK+".
Plus, according to the Lablgtk documentation, there is no interface for this
class.
Is this fact about Lablgtk linked to the current status of GtkCurve inside
the whole GTK+ ensemble (ie, the maintainers don't want to maintain an
interface for a class that will disappear from GTK+) or is this a deliberate
choice, or have I not searched enough ?
Thanks in advance for your time.
Johan Mazel

--0015175ce134338b5f048fbecaf5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi<br>I want to draw several curve using GTK+ and Lablgtk.<br>According to =
my research, the most appropriate class for this is the class called GtkCur=
ve (<a href=3D"http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/2.16/GtkCurve.html">http:=
//library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/2.16/GtkCurve.html</a>).<br>
However, in GTK+ documentation (cf previous link), this class is considered=
 &quot;too specialized/little-used for
 GTK+&quot;.<br>Plus, according to the Lablgtk documentation, there is no i=
nterface for this class.<br>Is this fact about Lablgtk linked to the curren=
t status of GtkCurve inside the whole GTK+ ensemble (ie, the maintainers do=
n&#39;t want to maintain an interface for a class that will disappear from =
GTK+) or is this a deliberate choice, or have I not searched enough ?<br>
Thanks in advance for your time.<br>Johan Mazel<br>

--0015175ce134338b5f048fbecaf5--


--===============1646320273==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Lablgtk mailing list
Lablgtk@yquem.inria.fr
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lablgtk

--===============1646320273==--