Delivered-To: garrigue at math.nagoya-u.ac.jp
Delivered-To: lablgtk at yquem.inria.fr
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:04:40 +0200
From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack at upsilon.cc>
To: lablgtk at yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Lablgtk] [ANN] ocaml-gir 0.9 alpha - binding generator for
	glib2-based libs
Message-ID: <20091012150440.GA22421 at usha.takhisis.invalid>
References: <666572260910040501n79651d01r33566967299a4572 at mail.gmail.com>
	<666572260910120251r5ac76f62lda0ac557005157e6@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <666572260910120251r5ac76f62lda0ac557005157e6 at mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:51:56AM +0200, Adrien wrote:
> There is one problem for the webkit-gtk bindings however: webkit-gtk
> now requires that "the thread system is initialized" which is done
> through a call to g_init_thread() which isn't currently available in
> lablgtk2 (I've seen some commented code reference to it however).
> Would it be possible that this function is added in future releases?

Out of curiosity, is there any specific reasons for not integrating
ocaml-git tout court into lablgtk2?  IIUC the roadmap in front of GLib
upstreams, GIR is pretty much an intimately part of it, what do we gain
in keeping the projects separate?

/me just thinking aloud

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..|  .  |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime

_______________________________________________
Lablgtk mailing list
Lablgtk@yquem.inria.fr
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lablgtk