Delivered-To: lablgtk at yquem.inria.fr
From: Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com>
Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
To: lablgtk at yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Lablgtk] Re: glade or not
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:09:25 +0000
References: <200711061646.23450.san.vu-ngoc at laposte.net>
	<200711101030.28645.san.vu-ngoc@laposte.net>
	<fh4kea$s3g$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <fh4kea$s3g$1 at ger.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200711101609.25180.jon at ffconsultancy.com>
Cc: Dawid Toton <d0 at wp.pl>, lablgtk at math.nagoya-u.ac.jp
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Length: 740

On Saturday 10 November 2007 15:57, Dawid Toton wrote:
> Vu Ngoc San pisze:
> > Right, so you have no opinion, or is it just that there is nobody on this
> > list ?
> >
> > Thanks anyway
> > San
>
> I don't use glade, becouse for me OCaml is expressive enough so I can
> create GUI in a nimble way using my own constructs.
> Dawid

Me too. However, our GUIs are often easy to generate programmatically (because 
they involve a lot of repetition) and often contain custom widgets (primarily 
OpenGL).

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?e

_______________________________________________
Lablgtk mailing list
Lablgtk@yquem.inria.fr
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lablgtk